14(B) Critically Analyse the Role of Command Area Development Programme in Alleviating Regional Inequalities in India
Word Count: ~1000 | Summary in Telugu | Memory Tricks Included
🧠 Thinking Process:
To critically analyse this topic, we’ll break it down into key components:
- Understand the concept and objectives of the Command Area Development Programme (CADP).
- Link it to the goal of reducing regional inequalities.
- Highlight successes, failures, and criticisms.
- Conclude with suggestions for improvement and future relevance.
📝 Introduction
India, being a vast and diverse country, faces stark regional disparities in agricultural productivity, irrigation access, and rural infrastructure. To address these, the Command Area Development Programme (CADP) was launched in 1974-75 with the objective of bridging the gap between irrigation potential created and its actual utilization.
The CADP aimed to bring holistic development in the command areas of major and medium irrigation projects, ensuring not just water delivery but also land development, crop management, and infrastructure creation.
🚜 Objectives of CADP:
- Ensure equitable distribution of irrigation water.
- Increase agricultural productivity in command areas.
- Introduce scientific water management practices.
- Promote participatory irrigation management (PIM) through Water Users' Associations.
- Improve on-farm development (OFD) like field channels, drains, etc.
🌍 Regional Inequalities in India – The Context
India’s agriculture is marked by wide disparities:
- Eastern India (e.g., Bihar, Jharkhand) and rain-fed regions of Telangana and Karnataka face water shortages.
- Northern states like Punjab and Haryana have historically benefitted from canal irrigation.
- Drought-prone regions lag behind in irrigation infrastructure and hence, productivity.
CADP was expected to reduce this imbalance by maximising benefits from existing irrigation infrastructure, particularly in backward and underdeveloped regions.
✅ Positive Contributions of CADP in Reducing Regional Inequalities
1. Improved Water Utilisation
- CADP helped to convert potential created into actual irrigated land, especially in regions like Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Odisha, and Maharashtra.
- Created field channels, drainage systems, and warabandi (rotation) systems, increasing equitable water access.
2. Boost to Agricultural Productivity
- Regions under CADP saw increased cropping intensity, leading to better income levels and employment opportunities.
- It helped marginal and small farmers in backward regions move from subsistence to commercial farming.
3. Participatory Irrigation Management (PIM)
- Involvement of Water User Associations (WUAs) empowered local farmers and reduced dependency on bureaucracy.
- Strengthened grassroots governance and equity in distribution.
4. Multi-sectoral Development
- Linked with rural roads, markets, storage, and extension services, thus ensuring holistic development of backward regions.
❌ Criticisms and Limitations of CADP
1. Skewed Implementation
- A majority of the funds and focus were on already developed regions, like Punjab and Tamil Nadu, instead of underdeveloped eastern India.
- Backward regions continued to lack institutional support and manpower for implementation.
2. Inefficient Water Management
- Many projects suffered from water logging, soil salinity, and seepage, especially where canal design was poor.
- Lack of real-time monitoring and feedback mechanisms.
3. Lack of Coordination
- The programme required coordination between irrigation, agriculture, rural development, and finance departments, which often failed due to bureaucratic delays.
4. Neglect of Rain-fed Areas
- CADP focused only on canal command areas, neglecting rain-fed and dryland regions, where regional inequality was actually worse.
5. Low Participation of Farmers
- In several states, PIM remained on paper due to lack of awareness, training, and political interference.
🔄 Recent Reforms and Revamping Efforts
- CADWM (Command Area Development and Water Management) was restructured in 2004 and merged with Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme (AIBP) in Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY).
- Emphasis is now placed on:
- Micro-irrigation (drip, sprinkler)
- Water-use efficiency
- Decentralised water governance
💡 Suggestions to Strengthen CADP for Equity
-
Prioritise Backward and Rain-fed Regions
- Extend the scope of CADP to rain-fed and tribal areas with watershed models.
-
Strengthen Local Institutions
- Empower and fund Water Users’ Associations for on-ground implementation.
-
Use of Technology
- GIS, remote sensing, and IoT for real-time monitoring of irrigation efficiency and water flow.
-
Integrated Water Resource Management
- Include drinking water, agriculture, and industry under a unified water use policy in command areas.
-
Performance-linked Funding
- Allocate funds based on outcomes rather than just infrastructure creation.
🧾 Conclusion
The Command Area Development Programme, despite its intent, has had a mixed impact on reducing regional inequalities. It contributed significantly in certain regions but failed to address the core disparities in irrigation access between canal-fed and rain-fed areas.
To make the programme truly effective, bottom-up planning, technological integration, and focus on underdeveloped areas is the need of the hour.
📌 Summary in Telugu:
కమాండ్ ఏరియా అభివృద్ధి ప్రోగ్రామ్ (CADP) భారతదేశంలో నీటి వనరుల సమర్థ వినియోగం కోసం ప్రారంభించబడింది. ఇది సమాన నీటి పంపిణీ, పంట ఉత్పాదకత పెంపు, మరియు ప్రాంతీయ అసమానతల తగ్గింపుపై దృష్టి సారించింది.
కానీ ఇది కొన్ని అభివృద్ధి చెందిన ప్రాంతాలలో మాత్రమే ఫలితాలు చూపి, తక్కువ అభివృద్ధి చెందిన రాష్ట్రాలలో సరైన ఫలితాలు ఇవ్వలేదు. పార్టిసిపేటరీ ఇరిగేషన్ మేనేజ్మెంట్, టెక్నాలజీ వాడకం, మరియు బ్యాక్వర్డ్ ఏరియాలపై ప్రాధాన్యత కలిగించడమే ఈ ప్రోగ్రామ్ను సమర్థవంతంగా మార్చగల మార్గం.
🧠 Tricks to Remember (in Telugu & English):
🎯 TRICK: “CAMP”
- C – Canal Water distribution
- A – Agriculture Productivity boost
- M – Multi-sector Coordination
- P – PIM (Participatory Irrigation Management)
🧠 మేం గుర్తుపెట్టుకోడానికి చిన్న మాటలు:
- "నీరు – పంట – పల్లె – పాలన"
(Water – Crop – Village – Governance) → CADP యొక్క నాలుగు ముఖ్య అక్షాలు
ఇలాంటి విమర్శాత్మక విశ్లేషణలు గ్రూప్ 1
Deep
## Critical Analysis of the Command Area Development Programme's Role in Alleviating Regional Inequalities in India
The **Command Area Development Programme (CADP)**, launched in **1974-75**, represents a significant governmental effort to bridge India's **persistent regional inequalities** by optimizing irrigation potential and boosting agricultural productivity. Initially designed to reduce the gap between **"Irrigation Potential Created" (IPC)** and **"Irrigation Potential Utilized" (IPU)**, CADP targeted socio-economic disparities through integrated water and land management. This analysis evaluates its successes, limitations, and transformative potential in addressing spatial inequities.
### 1. **CADP’s Mechanisms for Reducing Regional Inequalities**
#### A. **Infrastructure Development in Backward Regions**
- CADP prioritized **arid and semi-arid regions** with high agricultural potential but low development. For example, the **Indira Gandhi Canal Project** transformed Rajasthan’s desert districts (e.g., Bikaner, Jaisalmer) by constructing field channels, drains, and storage structures. This turned **1.96 million hectares** of barren land into cultivable areas, reducing poverty and out-migration .
- In eastern India (e.g., Odisha’s Hirakud project), CADP modernized canal systems, mitigating water scarcity and enabling **double-cropping**. This countered historical neglect of the region despite its fertile soils .
#### B. **Equitable Water Distribution**
- **Water Users’ Associations (WUAs)**, mandated under CADP, ensured fair allocation between head-reach and tail-end farmers. In the **Krishna-Godavari Basin**, WUAs resolved upstream-downstream conflicts, improving water access for marginalized farmers .
- **Rotational water supply systems** in Punjab’s Bhakra Nangal command area guaranteed reliable irrigation, boosting wheat yields by **30–40%** and narrowing the productivity gap with water-rich states .
#### C. **Socio-Economic Upliftment**
- **Agricultural intensification** increased incomes in CADP zones. Gujarat’s Sardar Sarovar command area saw **25–50% income growth** among small farmers through high-value crops like cotton and groundnut .
- **Poverty reduction** was notable in regions like Telangana, where CADP-linked training programs empowered marginalized communities, including SC/ST farmers, to adopt drip irrigation and diversify livelihoods .
### 2. **Impact on Regional Inequalities: Successes**
#### A. **Bridging the East-West Divide**
- CADP narrowed disparities between **irrigation-rich western states** (e.g., Punjab) and **rain-fed eastern states**. Projects in the Damodar Valley (Jharkhand/West Bengal) expanded irrigation coverage by **1.5 million hectares**, reducing yield gaps in rice cultivation .
- **Economic diversification** in CADP zones spurred agro-processing industries. Maharashtra’s Godavari Basin developed **rice mills and sugar cooperatives**, creating non-farm jobs .
#### B. **Environmental Resilience**
- **Reclamation of waterlogged areas** in Punjab and Haryana through bio-drainage and subsurface pipes improved soil health, reversing productivity declines .
- **Sustainable practices** like drip irrigation in Tamil Nadu cut water use by **40–60%** while increasing sugarcane yields, demonstrating climate adaptation .
### 3. **Limitations and Exacerbated Inequalities**
#### A. **Spatial and Social Exclusion**
- **Neglect of rain-fed areas**: CADP focused solely on **major/medium irrigation projects**, bypassing **75% of India’s cropland** reliant on rain or small-scale irrigation. Drought-prone regions like Bundelkhand remained marginalized .
- **Elite capture**: Land consolidation under CADP often benefited medium/large farmers. In the Tungabhadra project (Karnataka), WUAs were dominated by dominant castes, excluding landless laborers .
#### B. **Implementation Flaws**
- **Unreliable water supply**: Only **45–60% of IPU** was achieved in projects like Nagarjuna Sagar (Telangana) due to silted canals and power shortages .
- **Environmental costs**: The Indira Gandhi Canal caused **waterlogging and salinity** in Stage-II areas (Jaisalmer), rendering 10% of land uncultivable .
#### C. **Institutional Weaknesses**
- **Bureaucratic delays** and **funding shortfalls** stalled projects. The 2004 restructuring into **CAD and Water Management Programme (CADWMP)** improved coordination but failed to ensure timely WUA formation .
- **Technocratic approach**: Top-down planning ignored local agro-ecology. In Jharkhand, unsuitable cropping patterns led to crop failures .
### 4. **Transformative Potential and Pathways Forward**
CADP’s legacy lies in establishing a **framework for participatory irrigation management**. Its integration into the **Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY)** (2015) offers opportunities to address past gaps through:
- **Inclusive coverage**: Expanding CADP principles to **rain-fed areas** via PMKSY’s **"Per Drop More Crop"** component .
- **Strengthening WUAs**: Empowering them with legal authority and financial autonomy, as seen in Andhra Pradesh’s **Neeru-Chettu** program .
- **Climate-smart agriculture**: Scaling up **GIS-based water budgeting** (e.g., Bhakra-Nangal) and solar-powered micro-irrigation to enhance resilience .
### Conclusion: A Partial Success with Unfinished Agendas
CADP made **significant strides** in reducing regional inequalities by transforming arid zones into productive landscapes and empowering farmers through WUAs. However, its **limited coverage**, **social inequities**, and **environmental trade-offs** underscore incomplete outcomes. For CADP to fully bridge India’s spatial divides, future iterations must adopt **decentralized governance**, **inclusive targeting**, and **ecological restoration**.
---
### తెలుగులో సారాంశం (Summary in Telugu):
**కమాండ్ ఏరియా డెవలప్మెంట్ ప్రోగ్రామ్ (CADP)** 1974–75లో ప్రారంభించబడింది, ఇది **సాగునీటి సామర్థ్యాన్ని అభివృద్ధి చేయడానికి** మరియు **ప్రాంతీయ అసమానతలను తగ్గించడానికి** రూపొందించబడింది. ఇది రాజస్థాన్లోని ఇందిరా గాంధీ కాలువ వంటి ప్రాజెక్టుల ద్వారా ఎడారి ప్రాంతాలను సాగుభూములుగా మార్చింది. **వాటర్ యూజర్స్ అసోసియేషన్స్ (WUAs)** నీటి సమాన పంపిణీని నిర్ధారించాయి.
**ప్రధాన విజయాలు**:
- పంజాబ్లో **బంగారు పంట దిగుబడులు** 40% పెరిగాయి.
- తూర్పు భారత్లో (ఉదా. హీరాకుడ్) **సాగు విస్తీర్ణం విస్తరించడం**.
- గుజరాత్లో **కుటుంబ ఆదాయాలు 25–50% పెరగడం**.
**పరిమితులు**:
- **వర్షాధారిత ప్రాంతాలు** (బుందేల్ఖండ్ వంటివి) విస్మరించబడ్డాయి.
- **నీటి వనరుల అసమర్థ నిర్వహణ** (నాగార్జునసాగర్లో 45–60% సామర్థ్యం మాత్రమే ఉపయోగం).
- **భూస్వాముల ఆధిపత్యం** ఉండడం వల్ల సామాజిక అసమానతలు కొనసాగడం.
**భవిష్యత్ మార్గాలు**:
- **PMKSY** ద్వారా వర్షాధారిత ప్రాంతాలను చేర్చుకోవడం.
- **WUAs**కు ఎక్కువ అధికారాలు ఇవ్వడం.
- **డ్రిప్ ఇరిగేషన్** వంటి స్థిరమైన పద్ధతులను ప్రోత్సహించడం.
CADP **భాగస్వామ్య ప్రయత్నాలకు నాంది పలికింది**, కానీ **సమగ్రమైన సంస్కరణలు** మరియు **పర్యావరణ సున్నితత్వం** అవసరం.
---
### Thinking Process & Memorization Tricks
#### **Thinking Process for Critical Analysis**:
1. **Context Setting**:
- Define CADP’s objectives (bridge IPC-IPU gap, reduce inequalities).
- Note India’s regional disparities (e.g., Punjab vs. Odisha).
2. **Success Evaluation**:
- Infrastructure: Case studies (Indira Gandhi Canal, Bhakra Nangal).
- Socio-economics: Income data from Gujarat/Punjab.
3. **Limitations Scrutiny**:
- Exclusion: Rain-fed areas, small farmers.
- Environmental costs: Salinity in Rajasthan.
4. **Future Integration**:
- Link CADP to PMKSY’s holistic approach.
5. **Balanced Conclusion**:
- "Partial success" framework.
#### **Tricks to Remember Key Points (Telugu & English)**:
- **TELUGU ACRONYMS**:
- **క.ని.ప్ర (CADP)**:
- **క**మాండ్ ఏరియా అభివృద్ధి
- **ని**టి సమాన పంపిణీ
- **ప్ర**ాంతీయ అసమానతల తగ్గింపు
- **ENGLISH MNEMONICS**:
- **"WATER"**:
- **W**UAs for equity
- **A**rid-zone transformation (Rajasthan)
- **T**echnical gaps (IPC-IPU shortfall)
- **E**lite capture issues
- **R**eform pathways (PMKSY integration)
#### **Comparative Tables for Quick Recall**:
**Table 1: CADP’s Impact on Regional Inequalities**
| **Region** | **Positive Impact** | **Limitations** |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| **Punjab/Haryana** | 30–40% yield increase; WUA success | Environmental degradation |
| **Rajasthan** | 1.96M ha irrigated; poverty reduction | Stage-II salinity issues |
| **Eastern India** | Double-cropping in Hirakud | Low WUA participation |
**Table 2: CADP vs. PMKSY**
| **Factor** | **CADP (1974–2004)** | **PMKSY (2015–present)** |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| **Coverage** | Major/medium projects only | Includes rain-fed areas (HKKP) |
| **Technology** | Limited adoption | "Per Drop More Crop" focus |
| **Equity** | Elite capture in WUAs | Targeted SC/ST inclusion |
No comments:
Post a Comment